1. Anonymity is a tool that affords us to bring focus to our agenda rather than to the participants of the movement – a way of maintaining the idea(s) above any events or individuals involved.
2. Anonymity keeps the issue of change the focus. Not allowing the individual demographics of those involved in change to be used by bad management to marginalize or detract from the issue.
3. Anonymity prevents opening a direct discussion between BAG and bad management, and forces bad management to address the student body as a whole.
4. Anonymity opens the door for other actions about which bad management may be very unhappy.
5. Anonymity prevents bad management from changing the dynamics and co-opting BAG into a
negotiation.
6. We are truly concerned of the fairness of the institution as marginalization can happen in very
subtle ways. Let bad management address the faculty, not us. Then let us all debate the idea(s) – not the names.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
If you choose to stay anonymous, anyone can claim to be you. I can tell to Wytze that I am the BAG, and have a nice chat and a coffee with him.
Please don't be so childish: OPEN DEBATE!!!! Show your face! We are all civilized people.
Of course you will have enough so called intellectual reasons to stay anonymous.
However, it's now quite hard to distinguish your behavior from a 14 year old kid in an internet chatbox but moreover it's impossible to stay anonymous and participate in a process to improve the current policy at the same time.
Quit your guerilla style, ideological poster-talk and participate for real.
Dear Toon,
I think you have a point: a very good point. Problem is you haven't seen it yourself. Yes! If you are dissatisfied about the same issues than BAG,or if you have a better idea of what BK or your education should be, then you should go to Patijn have coffee and tell him YOU are BAG. And if don't want to be anonymous don't. Names are not forbidden, but also not demanded, it's our right to choose where we use them.
Post a Comment